Tom regans animal rights human wrongs

Although I have not had a permanent residence there for more than forty years I still consider Pittsburgh my home. The Burgh sets its roots deep in those who have known it. The City gets in your blood.

Tom regans animal rights human wrongs

Tom Regan - Wikipedia

Should non-human animals be treated fairly and equally to humans? Yes, animals and humans should have similar rights. No, animals and humans should not be treated equally. In this article, I will review much of Regan's discussion about the matter of "animal rights" and analyze several of his arguments which attest to the liberation of animals from the cruel grasps of speciesist humans.

His first and second chapters help to show what kinds of cruelty animals are subjected to. After briefly reviewing the first two chapters, I will review many of the theories which Regan presents throughout chapters three through seven.

After, I will briefly analyze several of Regan's responses to critique in chapters eight an nine. Finally, I will summarize my thoughts on the book and relate which I thought were Regan's strongest arguments.

Essentially, they help to show the massive amounts of cruelty that animals are victim to every single day. As more thoroughly discussed in another article analyzing Singer's Animal Liberationwe are made aware of animals produced for food, such as anemic veal calves and factory farm raised hogs and chickens.

Regan then goes on to tell how the fashion industry exploits animals for their furs or pelts. He relates how minks are made to suffer in unnatural conditions which go completely against their environments in the wild. Furthermore, Regan tells how many animals are captured for their furs.

One of the most cruel ways to make an animal suffer is to trap it in a steel-jawed trap and allow it to writhe and struggle until the trapper makes his rounds and ends the poor animal's life once and for all.

Tom regans animal rights human wrongs

Finally, Regan emphasizes the cruelty done to animals in laboratory testing facilities. Drug manufacturers, cosmetic companies, and other such scientists subject animals to studies which rarely offer benefit to human beings as a whole.

Regan concludes with the notion that while using animals for tools, or as means to an end, nears the highest human capacity for evil, tests such as LD50 tests and other cosmetic oriented testings are slowly diminishing due to a higher standard of morality and the general public finding out what happens to animals when they are used as tools rather than as pets.

Positive and Negative Rights Chapter three begins the real purpose of the book: However, before Regan is able to show this, he must first show that humans have rights in a moral sense. In order to show this, he begins by showing what kinds of rights can be hand; positive and negative rights.

Negative rights are ones such as the invisible "No Trespassing" signs that humans might have for their body. Negative rights give humans bodily integrity, the right not to be harmed by another person, or the right not to have their person invaded by another.

Positive rights, if there are such things, are the rights or benefits of human society; such as the right to health care or an education. However, while there may be such a thing as positive rights, we shall focus solely on negative rights, for these are the kinds of rights in which Regan bases his later arguments for the rights of animals.

An American Philosopher: Specializes In Animal Rights

Thus, negative rights will reign in the realm of moral rights. There are two basic assumptions when it comes to negative rights.

First, the attainment of negative rights means that other humans do not have the right to physically harm or invade your body without your consent to do so; this is much like the invisible "No Trespassing" sign Regan describes.

Second, the possession of negative rights means that other humans may not impede upon or limit your personal autonomy or freedom. If humans do possess these two rights, then negative rights should always trump any other rights of morality.Alternative views are critically examined, including (a) the Kantian account, which holds that our duties regarding animals are actually indirect duties to humanity; (b) the cruelty account, which holds that the idea of cruelty explains why it is wrong to treat animals in certain ways; and (c) the utilitarian account, which holds that the value of Author: Tom Regan.

In “Animal Rights, Human Wrongs”, the idea of animal rights is directly and thoroughly supported. Written by Tom Regan, the article presents a several cases of animal cruelty in a seemingly attempt to put the reader in a parallel perspective of each animal in attempt to cause the reader to feel sorry or some form of sympathy for each victim.

Thus those involved in the animal rights movement are partners in the struggle to secure respect for human rights - the rights of women, for example, or minorities, or workers. The animal rights movement is cut from the same moral cloth as these.

How to cite this page

Almost all of Reagan’s books address the issue of animal rights and the animal rights theory. Reagan argues that, though nonhuman, animals also have their moral rights and they should be treated with inherent value and respect.

Among his top books include: 1) The Case for Animal Rights. This is of the Reagan’s famous books. THE CASE FOR ANIMAL RIGHTS By Tom Regan From: ANIMAL RIGHTS AND HUMAN OBLIGATIONS to you, of course, not to your dog. Your neighbor no more wrongs your dog than your car would be wronged if the windshield were smashed.

Your neighbor's duties involving your dog are indirect duties to you. is not the sort an advocate of animal or human. Feb 28,  · Animal Rights, Human Wrongs by Tom Regan Tom Regan, an animal rights activist, wrote Animal Rights, Human Wrongs to show that animals have rights in just the same way as humans do.

In this article, I will review much of Regan's discussion about the matter of "animal rights" and analyze several of his arguments which attest to the liberation of Reviews: 1.

Tom Regan, Animal rights, human wrongs - PhilPapers